改良腹腔镜脾切除联合贲门周围血管离断术治疗肝硬化门静脉高压症的临床疗效

Comparison of modified laparoscopic and open splenectomy and pericardial devascularization for the treatment of cirrhotic portal hypertension

  • 摘要: 目的
    探讨改良腹腔镜脾切除联合贲门周围血管离断术治疗肝硬化门静脉高压症的安全性及其近期疗效。
    方法
    回顾性分析2010年1月至2013年2月扬州大学临床医学院收治的107例肝硬化门静脉高压症患者的临床资料。接受改良腹腔镜脾切除联合贲门周围血管离断术患者为改良腹腔镜组(37例),开腹脾切除联合贲门周围血管离断术为开腹组(70例),比较两组患者术中和术后情况。计量资料采用 t 检验或MannWhitney U检验,计数资料采用χ 2 检验。结果
    改良腹腔镜组患者的中位手术时间为210 min(185~245 min),明显长于开腹组的175 min(150~190 min),两组比较,差异有统计学意义( Z= =5.913,P <0.05)。
    结论
    改良腹腔镜脾切除联合贲门周围血管离断术治疗肝硬化门静脉高压症安全可行且疗效确切,其近期疗效明显优于开腹手术。

     

    Abstract: Objective
    To investigate the safety and short term efficacy of modified laparoscopic and open splenectomy and pericardial devascularization for the treatment of cirrhotic portal hypertension.
    Methods
    The clinical data of 107 patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension who were admitted to the Clinical Medical College of Yangzhou University from January 2010 to February 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into the modified laparoscopic group (37 patients) and the open group (70 patients). The intra and postoperative condition of the patients of the 2 groups were compared. The measurement data were analyzed using the t test or Mann Whitney U test, and the enumeration data were analyzed using the chi square test.
    Results
    The median operation time of the modified laparoscopic group was 210 minutes (range, 185 -200 ml), 2.5±0.9, (1.5±0.7)days, (2.4±1.0)days, (2.7±0.7)days, (10.5±2.2)days in the modified laparoscopic group, and 300 ml (range, 188 400 ml), 5.1±1.1, (2.8±0.6)days, (3.2±1.0)days, (5.9±0.9)days and (15.7±4.3)days in the open group, with significant difference between the 2 groups ( Z= -12.546,-9.834,-3.635,-18.780, -8.350, P <0.05). The number of patients who had postoperative complications in the modified =5.913, P <0.05).
    Conclusions The procedure of modified laparoscopic splenectomy and pericardial devascularization for cirrhotic portal hypertension is safe, feasible and with good therapeutic effect. It has better short term clinical effect than open surgery.

     

/

返回文章
返回